Whew! The Facebook namepocalypse is finally over. My latest Examiner piece covers the fallout:

The upshot: most everybody’s happy. Specifically:

1. People got the names they wanted, even if they didn’t get their first or second choices. I’ve seen minimal disgruntlement so far, even though most of the feedback  is on blog comments and discussion boards. And even for the ones who didn’t…

More at the link.

My second piece as SF Social Media correspondent for Examiner.com.

While you’re waiting for tonight’s Facebook namepocalypse, here’s a CNN with delightful anectode of stolen identity (delightful in that it was relatively harmless):

Facebook blogger Danielle Smith tells the story of discovering she had a photo of her stolen from Facebook…and used in a Czech supermarket ad.

More at the link.

As of, well, now, I’m the San Francisco Social Media correspondent for Examiner.com.

I had big plans for my first piece, but then this whole Facebook namepocalypse thing came up. So I led off with that:

Facebook gives you your (or at least a) name

I’d be remiss if I didn’t use my initial social media article to cover the biggest news in social media: Facebook’s decision to open up their URL format to personal names. And they’ve offered them up to their users in what’s being called a “land rush:” a first-come-first-served grab-your-name free-for-all starting at 12:01 AM Eastern time on Saturday, June 13.

More at the link. Let me know what you think!